<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Brief War History of the United States</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.abytheliberal.com/america/brief-war-history-us/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.abytheliberal.com/america/brief-war-history-us</link>
	<description>The Internationalist</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 21:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.abytheliberal.com/america/brief-war-history-us#comment-87316</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2011 10:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abytheliberal.com/america/brief-war-history-us#comment-87316</guid>
		<description>@Ian
The second opium war was conducted by a coalition of western forces which also consisted of American soldiers too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ian<br />
The second opium war was conducted by a coalition of western forces which also consisted of American soldiers too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ian</title>
		<link>http://www.abytheliberal.com/america/brief-war-history-us#comment-87164</link>
		<dc:creator>ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 10:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abytheliberal.com/america/brief-war-history-us#comment-87164</guid>
		<description>The Opium War? That was a British and later British and French enterprise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Opium War? That was a British and later British and French enterprise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pheonixedge</title>
		<link>http://www.abytheliberal.com/america/brief-war-history-us#comment-78917</link>
		<dc:creator>pheonixedge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 03:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abytheliberal.com/america/brief-war-history-us#comment-78917</guid>
		<description>The Allies in WWII had already agreed to a program of forcing the Axis powers to unconditional surrender as of Spring 1942.  As of the attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki several actions had occurred and must be taken into account:

I.The Bombings over German Skies that caused far more casualties.  These being a joint venture between all Allied Air powers provides global precedence for such actions.

II. The USSR was massing forces in the Kamchatka Peninsula, and had declared war upon The Empire of Japan.  The possibility of a Soviet dominated Pacific would have forced Anglo/American ground forces on the main islands without the program of unconditional surrender in place already.  American, French, and British interests in the area would have been affected in ways that would have shaped the future in a much different way.

III. The loss of human life was calculated at the time of the war by men who were in the position to have the best information to that task at any time past or present.  Their estimates cannot be shrugged off and cannot be taken lightly.

Also as to American colonialism:

The current American Conflicts are not unlike the European wars against indigenous tribes in the except for the fact that  they are backed by International Coalitions, though not in any way a large force, these show support from many forces.  From Europe to Asia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Allies in WWII had already agreed to a program of forcing the Axis powers to unconditional surrender as of Spring 1942.  As of the attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki several actions had occurred and must be taken into account:</p>
<p>I.The Bombings over German Skies that caused far more casualties.  These being a joint venture between all Allied Air powers provides global precedence for such actions.</p>
<p>II. The USSR was massing forces in the Kamchatka Peninsula, and had declared war upon The Empire of Japan.  The possibility of a Soviet dominated Pacific would have forced Anglo/American ground forces on the main islands without the program of unconditional surrender in place already.  American, French, and British interests in the area would have been affected in ways that would have shaped the future in a much different way.</p>
<p>III. The loss of human life was calculated at the time of the war by men who were in the position to have the best information to that task at any time past or present.  Their estimates cannot be shrugged off and cannot be taken lightly.</p>
<p>Also as to American colonialism:</p>
<p>The current American Conflicts are not unlike the European wars against indigenous tribes in the except for the fact that  they are backed by International Coalitions, though not in any way a large force, these show support from many forces.  From Europe to Asia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.abytheliberal.com/america/brief-war-history-us#comment-70112</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 09:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abytheliberal.com/america/brief-war-history-us#comment-70112</guid>
		<description>@ericoak
Didn't you read Aby's story? Japan has already offered conditional surrender, yet you arse still bombed them TWICE and occupy the archipelago for decades!
They want to die on the battlefield? Let them choose, they do not need Americans to think for them and killed them with Atomic bombs!

According to your statement, Japan deserve it because it attacked and killed millions of Chinese, then I think USA would deserve several nuclear attacks since it killed tens of millions after the second world war!!

Japanese have their pride and they were ready to fight for their country. They even wrote letters with their blood to beg the criminal court not to excecute their emperors! Let them die with honour in the battlefield not killing them while they were unprepared. FIGHT LIKE A MAN USA!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ericoak<br />
Didn&#8217;t you read Aby&#8217;s story? Japan has already offered conditional surrender, yet you arse still bombed them TWICE and occupy the archipelago for decades!<br />
They want to die on the battlefield? Let them choose, they do not need Americans to think for them and killed them with Atomic bombs!</p>
<p>According to your statement, Japan deserve it because it attacked and killed millions of Chinese, then I think USA would deserve several nuclear attacks since it killed tens of millions after the second world war!!</p>
<p>Japanese have their pride and they were ready to fight for their country. They even wrote letters with their blood to beg the criminal court not to excecute their emperors! Let them die with honour in the battlefield not killing them while they were unprepared. FIGHT LIKE A MAN USA!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c.d.</title>
		<link>http://www.abytheliberal.com/america/brief-war-history-us#comment-59747</link>
		<dc:creator>c.d.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 22:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abytheliberal.com/america/brief-war-history-us#comment-59747</guid>
		<description>Aby said:  "The problem with the American conflicts are not that people like these wars, but that these wars are often perpetuated by their government without public approval and knowledge."

Aby, I disagree on the approval part.  Two of the USA's most tragic and idiotic blunders had the approval of the majority of its citizens- the latest Iraq attack and each escalation in VietNam/Cambodia/Laos.   

As for knowledge- I agree.  A big part of the reason is that most americans are shockingly under-informed and often misinformed.  Although much of the ignorance is due to the decline in journalism in the US main stream media, americans' blindly believing what their politicians say and their MSM publishes are more than small factors.  Alas, methinks that even if the majority  grasped the important relevant facts, they'd probably still support similar stupid conflicts since jingoism is somehow embedded in the nation's DNA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aby said:  &#8220;The problem with the American conflicts are not that people like these wars, but that these wars are often perpetuated by their government without public approval and knowledge.&#8221;</p>
<p>Aby, I disagree on the approval part.  Two of the USA&#8217;s most tragic and idiotic blunders had the approval of the majority of its citizens- the latest Iraq attack and each escalation in VietNam/Cambodia/Laos.   </p>
<p>As for knowledge- I agree.  A big part of the reason is that most americans are shockingly under-informed and often misinformed.  Although much of the ignorance is due to the decline in journalism in the US main stream media, americans&#8217; blindly believing what their politicians say and their MSM publishes are more than small factors.  Alas, methinks that even if the majority  grasped the important relevant facts, they&#8217;d probably still support similar stupid conflicts since jingoism is somehow embedded in the nation&#8217;s DNA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tallen Lu</title>
		<link>http://www.abytheliberal.com/america/brief-war-history-us#comment-22212</link>
		<dc:creator>Tallen Lu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abytheliberal.com/america/brief-war-history-us#comment-22212</guid>
		<description>Bush is stupid but, Americans like Obama and McCain can fix the problems. You are very right irish chicago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush is stupid but, Americans like Obama and McCain can fix the problems. You are very right irish chicago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: irish chicago</title>
		<link>http://www.abytheliberal.com/america/brief-war-history-us#comment-18632</link>
		<dc:creator>irish chicago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abytheliberal.com/america/brief-war-history-us#comment-18632</guid>
		<description>I agree with  Greg we can't have all Americans smart and educated. We have people like bush and Cheney but we also have Obama and McCain. Who are educated and know what they are talking about. besides it took half a million lives taking over a piece of rock called Iwo Jima. so taking the Japenese mainland wouldn't be easy. Plus the women and children would have died that used weapons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with  Greg we can&#8217;t have all Americans smart and educated. We have people like bush and Cheney but we also have Obama and McCain. Who are educated and know what they are talking about. besides it took half a million lives taking over a piece of rock called Iwo Jima. so taking the Japenese mainland wouldn&#8217;t be easy. Plus the women and children would have died that used weapons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aby</title>
		<link>http://www.abytheliberal.com/america/brief-war-history-us#comment-1440</link>
		<dc:creator>Aby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abytheliberal.com/america/brief-war-history-us#comment-1440</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@ greg - "If you can point to ANY military action, by any nation throughout history that isn’t characterized by extreme violence, changing alliances, or acting in what at the time was believed to be in the nation’s own self-interest, then I would be interested in your listing of American actions."&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;p align="justify"&gt;I am glad you appreciate the destructive nature of wars. As someone already pointed out above, the US foreign policy is &lt;em&gt;primarily&lt;/em&gt; based on application of force (including wars to achieve self-fulfilling ends). There is no period in the last 50 years in the US history where the nation wasn't at war. &lt;/p&gt;
&#160;
&lt;strong&gt;@ greg - "And the cartoon itself is quite misleading as Saddam was only a nominal Muslim prior to his imprisonment."&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;p align="justify"&gt;The cartoon does not explicitly say that Saddam or Bush go to war for their 'godly' ideals. Saddam is as much Muslim as Bush is Christian and both know that religious sentiments of the fools can be easily exploited to goad warriors. Both these leaders exploit what they can. &lt;/p&gt;
&#160;
&lt;strong&gt;@ greg - "He invaded Kuwait because of his need for oil. During the first Gulf War, he launched missiles at Israel in a political attempt to turn the fight into a Arab-Israeli conflict."&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;p align="justify"&gt;I am afraid, Saddam is no longer alive to confirm or deny your claims, however true from your point of view it may seem. Perhaps he did it for oil or perhaps it was just to impress his wives, we can never know for sure unless we ask the real person.&lt;/p&gt;
&#160;
&lt;strong&gt;@ greg - "I’m certainly not apologizing for American actions, but I do think that trying to say we are any worse than any other country is disingenuous."&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;p align="justify"&gt;It is unfortunate that you think so. A country which is continuously engaged in serial wars, mass massacres, ethnic cleansing and genocides is worse than a country which is not doing any of these. It is even worse when moral justifications are made for all these crimes against humanity. We cannot have one set of standards for Americans and a seperate biased one for Nazis, Arabs or the other 'un-American' groups.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@ greg - &#8220;If you can point to ANY military action, by any nation throughout history that isn’t characterized by extreme violence, changing alliances, or acting in what at the time was believed to be in the nation’s own self-interest, then I would be interested in your listing of American actions.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p align="justify">I am glad you appreciate the destructive nature of wars. As someone already pointed out above, the US foreign policy is <em>primarily</em> based on application of force (including wars to achieve self-fulfilling ends). There is no period in the last 50 years in the US history where the nation wasn&#8217;t at war. </p>
<p>&nbsp;<br />
<strong>@ greg - &#8220;And the cartoon itself is quite misleading as Saddam was only a nominal Muslim prior to his imprisonment.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p align="justify">The cartoon does not explicitly say that Saddam or Bush go to war for their &#8216;godly&#8217; ideals. Saddam is as much Muslim as Bush is Christian and both know that religious sentiments of the fools can be easily exploited to goad warriors. Both these leaders exploit what they can. </p>
<p>&nbsp;<br />
<strong>@ greg - &#8220;He invaded Kuwait because of his need for oil. During the first Gulf War, he launched missiles at Israel in a political attempt to turn the fight into a Arab-Israeli conflict.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p align="justify">I am afraid, Saddam is no longer alive to confirm or deny your claims, however true from your point of view it may seem. Perhaps he did it for oil or perhaps it was just to impress his wives, we can never know for sure unless we ask the real person.</p>
<p>&nbsp;<br />
<strong>@ greg - &#8220;I’m certainly not apologizing for American actions, but I do think that trying to say we are any worse than any other country is disingenuous.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p align="justify">It is unfortunate that you think so. A country which is continuously engaged in serial wars, mass massacres, ethnic cleansing and genocides is worse than a country which is not doing any of these. It is even worse when moral justifications are made for all these crimes against humanity. We cannot have one set of standards for Americans and a seperate biased one for Nazis, Arabs or the other &#8216;un-American&#8217; groups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg</title>
		<link>http://www.abytheliberal.com/america/brief-war-history-us#comment-1376</link>
		<dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 17:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abytheliberal.com/america/brief-war-history-us#comment-1376</guid>
		<description>If you can point to ANY military action, by any nation throughout history that isn't characterized by extreme violence, changing alliances, or acting in what at the time was believed to be in the nation's own self-interest, then I would be interested in your listing of American actions.

And the cartoon itself is quite misleading as Saddam was only a nominal Muslim prior to his imprisonment. He quite often played upon the theological divide between Sunnis and Shites to control the population of the Iraq and targeted other minorities within his nation. When he targeted other nations, he did it for non-religious reasons. He invaded Kuwait because of his need for oil. During the first Gulf War, he launched missiles at Israel in a political attempt to turn the fight into a Arab-Israeli conflict.

I'm certainly not apologizing for American actions, but I do think that trying to say we are any worse than any other country is disingenuous. You could make the valid point that we aren't as high and mighty as we try to make ourselves out to be, but the educated people on both sides of the political spectrum already know that. The ignorant on both sides can't be taught otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you can point to ANY military action, by any nation throughout history that isn&#8217;t characterized by extreme violence, changing alliances, or acting in what at the time was believed to be in the nation&#8217;s own self-interest, then I would be interested in your listing of American actions.</p>
<p>And the cartoon itself is quite misleading as Saddam was only a nominal Muslim prior to his imprisonment. He quite often played upon the theological divide between Sunnis and Shites to control the population of the Iraq and targeted other minorities within his nation. When he targeted other nations, he did it for non-religious reasons. He invaded Kuwait because of his need for oil. During the first Gulf War, he launched missiles at Israel in a political attempt to turn the fight into a Arab-Israeli conflict.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m certainly not apologizing for American actions, but I do think that trying to say we are any worse than any other country is disingenuous. You could make the valid point that we aren&#8217;t as high and mighty as we try to make ourselves out to be, but the educated people on both sides of the political spectrum already know that. The ignorant on both sides can&#8217;t be taught otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ericoak</title>
		<link>http://www.abytheliberal.com/america/brief-war-history-us#comment-1257</link>
		<dc:creator>ericoak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 22:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abytheliberal.com/america/brief-war-history-us#comment-1257</guid>
		<description>Wow I can't really prove it since you can't prove a prediction of any type when dealing with modified history, however if you understand Japanese culture you would realize they would have fought to the death.  But why would they surrender, since the bad US attacked them first right?  But oh I haven't seen you condemn Japan for Pearl Harbor once!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow I can&#8217;t really prove it since you can&#8217;t prove a prediction of any type when dealing with modified history, however if you understand Japanese culture you would realize they would have fought to the death.  But why would they surrender, since the bad US attacked them first right?  But oh I haven&#8217;t seen you condemn Japan for Pearl Harbor once!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

