Archive for the 'Crimes' Category

Violence in United States of America

Dmitri October 4th, 2007

If someone made a suggestion that Americans are violent by nature, they would of course be met with strong moral outrage, mostly from Americans. It might not considered politically correct in the Anglo-Saxon world to suggest that Americans are violent, yet political correctness can hardly cover the fact that the United StatesĀ  is one of the most violent nations on earth, both by crime rates and by ideological glorification of violent pursuits. In this short piece, we will discuss in brief, the various social and political factors that are characteristic of violence in the United States, along with a brief overview of the facts and figures of violent crimes in United States. If you have any objection, agreement or argument against this article, feel free to use the comment form below.

A sarcastic cartoon by joyoftech.com on how Americans are more comfortable with violence than sexuality.

The United States has by far the largest number of people behind bars for violent crimes and one of the highest homicide rates in the world. According to the America’s FBI Crime in the United States 2005 data, violent crime rate in US was 469.2 per 100000 population as of the year 2005, the highest among industrialised countries. It must be noted that the American definition of violent crimes consitutes a smaller spectrum of crimes than European and Asian countries. The overall homicide and violent crime of US is comparable to that of disturbed East European and South-East Asian regions. Contrary to popular American arguments, 45.9% of the crimes between 1974 and 2004 are committed by whites, blacks make up a 52.1% and other races about 2%. The extent of crime in US can be best understood when it stands in a comparison with the rest of the world. The United States has less than 5% of world’s population and over 25% of the world’s population with criminal records.

 

There are several social and political factors which cause this crimes. One of them as explained above, is the inherent inclination of Americans towards violence. As is shown the the sarcastic cartoon above, most Americans would rather have their children watch a scene containing blood-lust and gore rather than a scene of intimacy or nudity. A human being with a slit throat or blood pouring out of its body is more acceptable than a human, hale and hearty but naked. Glorification of violence and war, are all covered by religious fundamentalist goups and very popular in the media. It is then no surprise that violence finds more social acceptability than love in United States. A point of note is that most American swearwords have a sexual theme, while a word ‘fucker’ is an insult, if one calls someone a ‘killer’ in America, it is a matter of pride.

 

Another cause of violence in America could be the large ownership of guns in America. Coupled with impusive behaviour and social acceptability of walking around with firearms, it is not surprise the a large proportion of violent crimes in America is because of guns. Guns in America is more acceptable and normal on kids than cellphones, many US states have laws that allow school kids to carry concealed handguns. There is also in incident where US authorities issued a gun on a 10 month old infant in Illonis state, admittedly the state with the strictest gun controls. If it were the 1700s and early 1800s, it would have been acceptable for an American to carry a gun to protect himself/herself from wild animals and predators, in today’s America it hardly makes sense. Issuing guns on 10-month old infants and untrained schoolkids is insanity, it is no surprise then that incidents in the likes of Columbine High School massacre and Virginia Tech massacre are exclusive to United States. The issue of gun control and gun related violence is so wide that it deserves an entire post on it for adequate justice.

 

The love of guns, social acceptability of violence and degradation of compassionate emotions, all point to the trait of Americans - they are inherently attracted to violence. Although there are people among Americans who are compassionate and kind-hearted, yet they have little voice in politics and society - one of the primary reasons for endless wars, genocides and mass violence in the annals of American history. One might ask - what has the issue of violent nature of Americans got to do with international politics? Well, one has to look at the way Americans attempt to push their way of life down the throat of third world denizens, with violent force and by portraying it as the only way of life worth living.

Spread the Word: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Netscape
  • NewsVine

Banning FGM - Cultural Imperialism or Protecting Rights?

Aby July 13th, 2007

We often come across news and hear of domestic abuses, sexual harassment and many other kinds of targeted crimes against women and children. There is one kind of abuse quite unheard of in the western world, which surpasses in cruelty and brutality all the abuses mentioned above. It is termed Female Genital Mutilation, FGM for short and is practised often in African Muslim countries either as a religious or cultural practice. The mutilation of the female genitalia, which is carried without an anaesthetic ranges from removing the clitoris to cutting off the entire external female genitalia altogether.

A news channel clip on beliefs and culture which motivate FGM in Africa (Click on video to play)

FGM is considered illegal in most developed countries, yet this does not stop parents flying their daughters to Africa to conduct it or smuggling in quacks to perform FGM in secret rituals. It is often difficult to prevent such incidents which are disturbingly common, performed in a cloak of secrecy so that it does not come to the notice of legal authorities. It has been often suggested in the European Union and United Nations about taking strong initiatives to put an end to this practice in Africa and other regions where it is practised. But it is feared that such strong moves might be considered as cultural imperialism by the practising communities and could create a negative impact against the western world. Of all the crimes against women, FGM with its health and human rights implications is one of the worst.

 

FGM and Health Concerns
As FGM is most often conducted without anaesthesia and non-surgical conditions, it can result in extreme pain, clinical shock, infections like tetanus and severe bleeding till anaemia. These are the short term implications with 20% of the cases being fatal. The long term implications are cysts, complications during menstruation and childbirth, endangering the life of both the mother and the baby. Women who have suffered genital mutilation are twice as likely to die in childbirth and three times as likely to give birth to a stillborn child. A wide range of psychological and psychosomatic disorders have been attributed to FGM, for example, disordered eating and sleeping habits, changes in mood and symptoms of impaired cognition, according to reports by World Health Organisation

 

FGM and Human Rights Concern
FGM is often conducted in very young girls below 15 years of age, without their consent and option to refuse. Since FGM involves the deformation of healthy organs, it violates the right to bodily integrity. FGM threatens the life and health of the girls and women violating their right to life and also their right to standard of living adequate for the health and well-being. All these rights violated are a part of Universal Declaration of Human Rights adopted by the UN General Assembly on December 10, 1948. The act of FGM violates at least one human right right to bodily integrity explicitly and intentionally and the others indirectly as adverse effects of FGM.

 

Although FGM is made illegal in most of the developed world including Europe, UK, USA, Canada and Australia in the last few years, it is still practised among migrant African communities in secrecy (where it is illegal) and in abandon (where it is not illegal). Protection of human rights does not imply cultural imperialism, whatever it may look like to the communities concerned. It is a shame that fear of being perceived as cultural imperialists makes the civilised the world reluctant to stop such violation of human rights from continuing in abandon at foreign soil and in secrecy on home soil.

 

Further Information -

Spread the Word: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Netscape
  • NewsVine

Next »