Comments on: A Nuclear Holocaust Cannot End The Human Race

By: omkarmoghe

omkarmoghe — Sat, 20 Feb 2010 18:09:11 +0000

My views are exactly opposite
i think the third world war never happened thanks to nukes
both US and Russia knew that no body is going to win

By: dreona burton

dreona burton — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 02:46:15 +0000

wow im only 13 yrs old and i just got done reading a book called there will come soft rains and this is really scary i mean my teacher was telling us about this then i heard her say it can effect the whole world so i decided to believe if its true or not and mow im really freakd out why would they have such bombs in a beautiful world lyke this that doesnt evn make sense and i thnk it can effect our whole world because i mean i saw the bombs jumping from country to contry or state to state watevr but when all that fire came so down fast i said to my self that this wasnt true and people burned to ash and sum ppl were burning to death and in the book there will come soft rains it had said every one turned to ash and this was only in 1 blink of an eye and everyone was ash and it said all of this happend on august 4 2026 in allendale california but im scared cause i live in california and i just dont know inno we have terrists and all but damn this shit is like haunting your ass!!!1

By: RedRussian

RedRussian — Mon, 05 Oct 2009 22:59:18 +0000

Yo guys you wana talk abotu climate change lol. Imagine how much oxygen woudl be burn and crap releised from all of thsoe wepons. idk how much just a q if anyone has an answer. WOudl it kill Humantity? no. woudl it destroy modern cities/ and technology? yes. Man woudl go back to the 1700’s sure we wouldent all die but dam dude peopel were freakign out from the fall out of chernobyl which wasnt horible. imagine where the win currents woudl take it and what woudl happen to the peopel there. it wouldent kill everyoen but i asure you no one woudl eb happy

By: Jay

Jay — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:47:52 +0000

Even if proven that even the entire nuclear arsenal isn’t sufficient to end the human race, this doesn’t award a single point in favor of nuclear weapons.

There r intelligent people who have already discovered the ill effects including nuclear winters and mutations, genetic alterations and whether changes.

But there is more, first what the remaining people will have to live with, their dead relatives, no land for cultivation, CONTAMINATED SURFACE WATER RESOURCES (i guess for that day the super powers r lukin 4 water on MARS).

The left over humans will be traumatized mentally and then with no foor or water cannibalism and……….

Tell u the truth, even our imaginations fall small when we imagine effects of a nuclear holocaust.

SO BETTER PRAY SHIT THAT THIS DOESN’T HAPPEN

By: Mike

Mike — Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:21:35 +0000

@ G. Vinod
Exactly, all the UN does is make useful decisions for the 5 security council countries. However, when the majority of the council votes against something that someone like the U.S. doesn’t agree with, the U.S. pretty much says “screw you guys, that’s threatening our soveirgnty. We don’t have to listen to you!What are you going to do?” So the U.S. and other countries do what they want even though it’s against what the UN voted for as a whole. The UN has no power to enforce it’s decisions on larger countries!

By: G.Vinod

G.Vinod — Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:28:22 +0000

The big powers, who got thousands of nuclear weapons, threaten other
countries which try to build the same type of weapon. When these powers
don’t take any proper action to dismantle their deadly weapons, then what
right they got to advise or threaten others? The biggest foolish institution
in this world is the UN, which has no independent plan and just dance to
the tunes of the big powers. The big 5 nuclear powers are given permanent
seat there and hence we can’t expect any useful decison coming out of it.
The UN has different yardsticks for every country and is also not brave enough
to tell the nuclear powers to shed their weapons.

By: Mike

Mike — Thu, 29 Jan 2009 04:35:43 +0000

@Well-Wisher
All countries should also turn over their armed forces and the only military be run by a world government.
There should also be global enviromental protection laws that everyone is forced to follow(especially the U.S.)

But, the world we live in is not such a rational place unfortunatly. I would bet most governments are too ignorant to even look into the idea of a world government because they think it would “infringe on their soverignty”. This is actually far from the case if the world government was run like a federation much liket he United States. Our states have plenty of power and are not run by a tyranical government for the most part(even though i’d like to believe we are sometimes). Plus, I think a reasonable world government would just need to have the power to enforce nuclear disarmorment, environmental protection, and conflict resolution. Nothing else. Unfortunatly, our governments are run by fearful and power seeking forces that don’t think about what’s good for the the many, just what’s good for themselves.

By: Well-Wisher

Well-Wisher — Thu, 29 Jan 2009 01:12:17 +0000

UNO should devise and form Nuke Free World Policy. It should ask all the nuclear armed countries to completely dismatle it. If any country trying to make or keep nuclear weapons secretly, UNO & its members should put a ban on everything to that rouge one and send troops to investigate and monitor for years time. By this way we can start preventing nuclear proliferation and protect our future generations life.

By: Tallen Lu

Tallen Lu — Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:19:08 +0000

Nucks can kill! The UN needs to do something!

By: aeiadlkfals

aeiadlkfals — Sun, 18 Jan 2009 03:21:00 +0000

Does anyone know why the internet was created? To make sure in the event of such an attack we could kill our opponent or killer. This whole article is stupid.