<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mutually Assured Destruction in Nuclear Politics</title>
	<link>http://www.abytheliberal.com/world-politics/mutually-assured-destruction-in-nuclear-politics</link>
	<description>The Internationalist</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: anti-Americanism - Page 24</title>
		<link>http://www.abytheliberal.com/world-politics/mutually-assured-destruction-in-nuclear-politics#comment-83</link>
		<author>anti-Americanism - Page 24</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 06:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.abytheliberal.com/world-politics/mutually-assured-destruction-in-nuclear-politics#comment-83</guid>
					<description>[...] which has a rougish foreign policy to realise the importance of diplomacy and peaceful coexistence. MAD, the most perfect acronym I have ever come across.   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] which has a rougish foreign policy to realise the importance of diplomacy and peaceful coexistence. MAD, the most perfect acronym I have ever come across.   [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anti-Americanism - Page 25</title>
		<link>http://www.abytheliberal.com/world-politics/mutually-assured-destruction-in-nuclear-politics#comment-85</link>
		<author>anti-Americanism - Page 25</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 14:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.abytheliberal.com/world-politics/mutually-assured-destruction-in-nuclear-politics#comment-85</guid>
					<description>[...] which has a rougish foreign policy to realise the importance of diplomacy and peaceful coexistence. MAD, the most perfect acronym I have ever come across.    I was just saying man, if we were thinking of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] which has a rougish foreign policy to realise the importance of diplomacy and peaceful coexistence. MAD, the most perfect acronym I have ever come across.    I was just saying man, if we were thinking of [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: China&#8217;s MAD Nuclear Deterrance Against USA &#124; Aby The Liberal</title>
		<link>http://www.abytheliberal.com/world-politics/mutually-assured-destruction-in-nuclear-politics#comment-291</link>
		<author>China&#8217;s MAD Nuclear Deterrance Against USA &#124; Aby The Liberal</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 18:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.abytheliberal.com/world-politics/mutually-assured-destruction-in-nuclear-politics#comment-291</guid>
					<description>[...] stockpile of about 5000 warheads. How could China with such a small nuclear stockpile have a MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) nuclear relationship with US? A simplified case of a probable nuclear war scenario between US and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] stockpile of about 5000 warheads. How could China with such a small nuclear stockpile have a MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) nuclear relationship with US? A simplified case of a probable nuclear war scenario between US and [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kapil</title>
		<link>http://www.abytheliberal.com/world-politics/mutually-assured-destruction-in-nuclear-politics#comment-5576</link>
		<author>Kapil</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.abytheliberal.com/world-politics/mutually-assured-destruction-in-nuclear-politics#comment-5576</guid>
					<description>most of the countries have icbm,s today .....so talking about wars on battle filed is stupid ,,,,,, who will wininthe end if even two of the most populous cities of India ,China or pakistan were hit by nuclear missiles ,,who cares who is winner after shanghai ,delhi ,karachi are destroyed and hundreds of years of urban culture is destroyed .....

even a small and weak country like pakistan can cause considerable damage to India or China ....

In the end the country with more schools ,hospitals clean water and good foriegn exchange reserves,wins ..........
so chill ,,,,,,,we dont need to buy more weapons from USA or RUssia or israelor france so they can enjoy our money and fuel hatred between us ...
India and china are two big neighbours with healthy competetion and a bit of healthy jealousy ....thats it .....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>most of the countries have icbm,s today &#8230;..so talking about wars on battle filed is stupid ,,,,,, who will wininthe end if even two of the most populous cities of India ,China or pakistan were hit by nuclear missiles ,,who cares who is winner after shanghai ,delhi ,karachi are destroyed and hundreds of years of urban culture is destroyed &#8230;..</p>
<p>even a small and weak country like pakistan can cause considerable damage to India or China &#8230;.</p>
<p>In the end the country with more schools ,hospitals clean water and good foriegn exchange reserves,wins &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.<br />
so chill ,,,,,,,we dont need to buy more weapons from USA or RUssia or israelor france so they can enjoy our money and fuel hatred between us &#8230;<br />
India and china are two big neighbours with healthy competetion and a bit of healthy jealousy &#8230;.thats it &#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
