<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Moral Question of the Nuclear Bomb</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.abytheliberal.com/world-politics/the-moral-question-of-nuclear-bomb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.abytheliberal.com/world-politics/the-moral-question-of-nuclear-bomb</link>
	<description>The Internationalist</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 11:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.abytheliberal.com/world-politics/the-moral-question-of-nuclear-bomb#comment-16418</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 03:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abytheliberal.com/2007/04/15/the-moral-question-of-nuclear-bomb/#comment-16418</guid>
		<description>There is NOTHING moral about nuclear weapons. What victory would it be if you defeated your adversary but also destroyed yourself. That would be the only outcome of a nuclear war. If you had to destroy the world to prove a political, religious or economic point then you wasted your time for not even yourself could benefit from your victory because we would all be dead. 

War itself whether conventional or non conventional is immoral. Is it the leaders of the nations that die.....no its the poor who have no power or say in the matter they are the ones who are sent out to die.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is NOTHING moral about nuclear weapons. What victory would it be if you defeated your adversary but also destroyed yourself. That would be the only outcome of a nuclear war. If you had to destroy the world to prove a political, religious or economic point then you wasted your time for not even yourself could benefit from your victory because we would all be dead. </p>
<p>War itself whether conventional or non conventional is immoral. Is it the leaders of the nations that die&#8230;..no its the poor who have no power or say in the matter they are the ones who are sent out to die.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internationalist</title>
		<link>http://www.abytheliberal.com/world-politics/the-moral-question-of-nuclear-bomb#comment-15355</link>
		<dc:creator>Internationalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abytheliberal.com/2007/04/15/the-moral-question-of-nuclear-bomb/#comment-15355</guid>
		<description>I maintain that attaining and retaining nuclear weapons is immoral, however strong the logical appeal may be. I think in order to have any credible discussion on this topic, the agreement must come in the form of strict definitions. The problem is, if too many nuclear weapons exist, and are controlled by an increasing number of nations, an accidental fire -- the Cold War has taught us that not only is this possible, but is very likely in a heightened state of paranoia -- would trigger nuclear exchange. 

So no, it is logical to have deterrence against aggressors; it is moral to defend a people of a nation. But to fulfill either of the two via nuclear weapons in no way constitutes morality, unless it is deemed a moral choice -- and we know how easily manipulated that is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I maintain that attaining and retaining nuclear weapons is immoral, however strong the logical appeal may be. I think in order to have any credible discussion on this topic, the agreement must come in the form of strict definitions. The problem is, if too many nuclear weapons exist, and are controlled by an increasing number of nations, an accidental fire &#8212; the Cold War has taught us that not only is this possible, but is very likely in a heightened state of paranoia &#8212; would trigger nuclear exchange. </p>
<p>So no, it is logical to have deterrence against aggressors; it is moral to defend a people of a nation. But to fulfill either of the two via nuclear weapons in no way constitutes morality, unless it is deemed a moral choice &#8212; and we know how easily manipulated that is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Are Americans Stupid? - Page 20 - Teen Forums</title>
		<link>http://www.abytheliberal.com/world-politics/the-moral-question-of-nuclear-bomb#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Are Americans Stupid? - Page 20 - Teen Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 05:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abytheliberal.com/2007/04/15/the-moral-question-of-nuclear-bomb/#comment-64</guid>
		<description>[...] and the Dresden massacre has the latter objective in mind, the stance changed when Stalin had the &#1055;&#1077;&#1088;&#1074;&#1072;&#1103; &#1084;&#1086;&#1083;&#1085;&#1080;&#1103; nuclear test in 1948 and showed even he could impress by killing dissidents.   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and the Dresden massacre has the latter objective in mind, the stance changed when Stalin had the &#1055;&#1077;&#1088;&#1074;&#1072;&#1103; &#1084;&#1086;&#1083;&#1085;&#1080;&#1103; nuclear test in 1948 and showed even he could impress by killing dissidents.   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anti-Americanism - Page 10</title>
		<link>http://www.abytheliberal.com/world-politics/the-moral-question-of-nuclear-bomb#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>anti-Americanism - Page 10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abytheliberal.com/2007/04/15/the-moral-question-of-nuclear-bomb/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>[...] up like Iraq or Vietnam and we didn't. Thanks to the big sticks called nuclear bombs and ICBMs.  The Moral Question of the Nuclear Bomb  __________________ I have removed by avatar on this forum because of the unwritten rule where [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] up like Iraq or Vietnam and we didn&#8217;t. Thanks to the big sticks called nuclear bombs and ICBMs.  The Moral Question of the Nuclear Bomb  __________________ I have removed by avatar on this forum because of the unwritten rule where [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
